I have been invited by Cara to make some comments on the
subject of this blog from a man’s point of view. I am humbled and honored by her request. Why?
Because I doubt any man can truly understand the issues that women
confront on a daily basis. I think we
can logically see many of the issues that they are confronted with, but as to
the emotional aspects of it, we don’t have a clue. We can be empathetic by sensing their
feelings, but we do not and cannot experience it. Because of that I am humbled by this request. The fact that Cara trusts me with this
awesome responsibility makes me feel honored.
Before I express my current views on a few subjects, let me
give you a bit of my history. I am
currently 70 years old. Yes, you can
have thoughts and express them cogently after 50. I reveal this because it is important to my
views. I spent my teen and young adult
time in the 60’s, a time of great social upheaval. I witnessed the rise of the women’s
movement. Burn the bra, the pill, ‘make
love, not war’, etc. It was an exciting
time to be alive and to observe, and participate in, such broad spectrum change
in people’s attitudes and choices. But,
it was also the time of great reflection on what it was to be human. Why did we have war? Why is there racism? Can your country do wrong? Why is there poverty? Why are people living in suppression? We were the original “Hippies”! And, while we may not look it, we still think
like it.
Let me begin my current views by discussing abortion. It is rather interesting, at least to me, how
my feelings have evolved on this subject.
To begin with, I was raised in a pretty typical middle class family
affiliated with a fairly main stream protestant faith. Abortion was not a typical subject of
conversation around the dinner table.
Yes, there were “girls” who left school for what seemed like no reason
at all. Teenage pregnancy was a
scandal. There was no pill, but hormones
still worked. But, how dare you discuss
it. Abortion was only an acceptable
option when certain conditions were present; health of the mother, rape, incest
and a child that would not live outside the womb.
When I started college in the mid 60’ things began to change
for me. I found out that some of “those
girls” that left in high school did not have their babies, but opted for a very
hush, hush abortion. The pill came into
existence and now the “fear” of unwanted pregnancies was reduced to almost
nil. Lo’ and behold I discovered women
liked sex, too! Freedom from fear can do
that. And I met women who decided that
they had a voice, and opinions, feelings of being oppressed by men, who cared
about the world and those in it. It was
the most delightful revelation I had ever had in my life, at the time. And, the greatest part of that revelation to
me was how little control these women felt they had on their own lives. I want to be a doctor they would say, but
society said, well you can be a nurse. I
want to be in politics they said, well run for the school board society said. The
women were right; they were being oppressed, in many different ways. And one of the biggest was control over their
own bodies. Abortion was still illegal
and done only in rather shady clinics and backward facilities often by people
who only wanted the money and cared little about the future and health of the
women. Granted there was the beginning
of enlightenment. Some physicians
realized that it was better to do it in well-equipped clinics, with trained
doctors. But it was very quietly done and not well advertised,
unfortunately. But that is what began my
real change. The fact that such a life
altering event as a pregnancy was controlled by everyone, except the pregnant
woman. It was either go full term or
break the law. Guys, don’t even go
anywhere with this. There is nothing in
any law that controls your body as long as what you do is legal. If you do, remember Carol Burnett’s great
line, “Men. Do you want to know what
it’s like to have a baby? First grab your upper lip. Now, pull it over your head!” That’s without
considering 9 months of carrying a child, as well.
The second point on this issue that hit me was the fact that
abortion had been ruled illegal by legislators in all states who were comprised
of a vast majority of men. What?? There were very few women in politics then
(and still surprisingly few, but it has improved). So, what a dichotomy, men deciding what
happens to a woman’s body when they become pregnant. It’s actually saying that once a woman
becomes pregnant, what she does is to involuntarily surrender herself to the
state. That’s the only logical
conclusion to that situation.
After college, I headed to graduate school in Chicago. My school was on the campus of the University
of Chicago, one of the hot beds of protest against the Vietnam War, social
change, outcry against racism and women’s right in the U.S. I witnessed the riots at the Democratic
Convention in 1968. I met members of the
Chicago 7; I attended services and rallies led Dr. Martin Luther King and Jesse
Jackson. I watched the power of the Daly
Machine controlling the city. What a place to be in a time like that.
Toward the end of my time in grad school the hot topic in
the country, along with the Vietnam War, was the pending decision by the
Supreme Court on the controversial “Roe vs. Wade” lawsuit. The basis for the law suit was the 14th
Amendment of the Constitution.
Especially the following sentence:
“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state
deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.”
It was the Equal Protection clause which the suit was based
on. The main argument against by the
anti-abortion movement was that they felt that it violated the equal protection
of the unborn. So now the main crux of
the matter became apparent. Was an
unborn a person under the law? Or, was a
pregnant woman not treated as equal under the law? When does life begin? What is life?
All important questions, but do they supersede the right of a person
(read woman) to have equal protection under the law. I won’t debate here when life begins. That can be a scientific question, or it can
be a belief question. There are those
that believe that all life is sacred, but by a scientific definition, harmful
bacteria are alive and we do all we can to kill them. People in irreversible comas, those on life
support with no cognizant brain function and those with severe dementia are
alive, but are the living? Those are
individual opinions that I leave for you each to decide on your own. But, the bottom line is this; I agree with
the Supreme Court in their decision on Roe vs. Wade. Women have the full right to decide what
happens to their bodies.
However, here we are over 40 years later and the debate is
still going on. Why? I think it can be reduced to only two
reasons. One, many men still have the
antiquated idea that they are superior to woman and objectify them as
things. I actually think they do this
because they are afraid of strong independent women who think for
themselves. It intimidates them and
makes them feel inferior. And, as for
me, they are inferior. Men and women are
both sides of the human experience. They
are the “ying and the yang” of who we are.
Personally, I revel in seeing women as my equal. I have had
relationships with many women in my life and all of them have were strong
independent women who had their own opinions, thoughts, careers and
personality. Why would a man want
anything else?
The second reason it is still with us is because of some
religious factions in our country that hold that abortion should be outlawed
because the unborn child is a “person of God”.
They proudly refer to themselves as “Pro-Life”. But, here is what changed my mind totally on
this group. It is a quote by Sister Joan
Chittister, a Benedictine nun from Erie, PA.
She holds a doctorate degree from Penn State University in speech
communication theory.
"I do not
believe that just because you're opposed to abortion that that makes you
pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if
all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a
child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any
tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much
broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."
Yes, the same people who want to stop every abortion are
usually the same ones who want to cut programs like, early childhood education,
aid to dependent mothers, after school programs, defund Planned Parenthood,
school lunch programs, Pell grants, all so they can save on their taxes. That is why she refers to them as
“pro-birth”. I totally agree with
her. I also see that many of these
people are from predominately conservative right leaning Christian denominations. They also covertly believe in segregation,
few rights for women, right wing governments, authoritarian control over their
churches and so forth. They want a world
where all issues have black and white answers.
There is no room for shades of grey in their worlds. If there were, they would have to think for
themselves. They want someone else to
decide for them. They live in an Old
Testament world where the laws laid down by the priests and prophets tell them
what to do. Yet they shout out, “Have you
found Jesus!” (Actually, I didn’t know that he was lost) But, at the same time they have no clue about
how Jesus preached of love, tolerance, forgiveness, grace and compassion. He makes us whole, not separated like the
law. He counted women as his equal. He did not spend time with religious
leaders. His disciples were fishermen,
tax collectors, common men. Enough said.
So, what is my conclusion? Abortion is a woman’s personal decision. Should she consult with those she loves? She can if she wants to. What about women’s rights? It’s something all men should support, because it is human rights. None of us will be equal until we realize that all of us should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment